Controversial Remarks Stir Debate on Unchangeable Constitutional Articles
İbrahim Kaboğlu, the newly elected President of the Istanbul Bar Association, made statements on his first day in office that sparked debates regarding the unchangeable articles of the constitution. Kaboğlu suggested that “positive changes” could be made to these articles. This statement, following his previous comments on historical amendments, provoked various reactions within the community.
Highlighting Historical Amendments
Kaboğlu’s reference to the 1995 and 2001 amendments was scrutinized more thoroughly. The 1995 amendment aimed to cover the disturbing effects of the Turkish internal conflicts by removing the parts that referenced the September 12 coup from the preamble of the constitution. However, Kaboğlu’s use of the term “racist expressions” began to be questioned in its historical context. He may have to clarify what he meant in this regard.
For the 2001 amendment, the emphasis was placed on the concept of “a secular and democratic republic based on human rights.” However, it was noted that these two amendments were unrelated to the unchangeable articles.
New Statements and Reactions
After observing the public reactions, the Bar President issued a correction, stating, “The first three articles are the foundation pillars embodying the rules that embrace the country, society, and state trio. Proposing their amendment is impossible.” This new statement also drew criticism from many who argued that the term “society” overshadowed the concept of “nation,” ignoring the relationship between national identity and cultural diversity.
Bar President’s Political Background
Kaboğlu’s past statements and positions on human rights issues seemed to contradict his recent comments, leading the public to view his stance as abstract. Whether he stood by his statements became a matter of debate. His comments also raised questions about his independence and impartiality as the head of a professional institution.
Outcome and Future
These developments have intensified debates focusing on the unchangeable articles of the constitution, prompting nationalist, patriotic, and republican circles to call for collective action. Recognizing the underlying intentions of the process, these groups aim to safeguard the core values of the constitution, ensuring the Turkish nation remains united, free from any demographic or ethnic divisions.